Conteúdo indexado
An evaluation of a visual–visual successive matching‐to‐sample procedure to establish equivalence classes in adults
2018 · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior; v. 109; n. 3; p. 533-550; Fonte: Wiley
Dados principais
- Ano de publicação
- 2018
- Dados editoriais
- Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior; v. 109; n. 3; p. 533-550; Fonte: Wiley
- Palavras-chave
- JEAB; análise do comportamento
- DOI
- 10.1002/jeab.326
Autores
- Charisse A. Lantaya
- Caio F. Miguel
- Timothy G. Howland
- Danielle L. LaFrance
- Scott V. Page
Resumo
Traditionally, behavior analysts have studied stimulus equivalence using a matching‐to‐sample (MTS) preparation. Although researchers have shown the utility of MTS to yield equivalence classes, the procedure requires several prerequisite skills for a learner to accurately respond. Previous research with humans and nonhumans has shown that relational responding can be produced via compound stimulus discrimination and successive matching‐to‐sample (S‐MTS). We conducted four experiments with college students to further evaluate the effectiveness of S‐MTS in the establishment of stimulus relations. S‐MTS trials consisted of the presentation of a single sample stimulus followed by one comparison in a fixed location on a computer screen. Depending upon the sample–comparison relation, participants touched (i.e., go) or did not touch (i.e., no‐go) the comparison stimulus. Following training of the baseline relations (AB/BC), we assessed the emergence of symmetry, transitivity, and equivalence performances (i.e., BA/CB and AC/CA). Results support the utility of the S‐MTS procedure as a possible alternative to traditional MTS. This study has direct implications for participants for whom traditional three‐array MTS procedures may be challenging.