Conteúdo indexado
PREFERENCE FOR SIGNALED OVER UNSIGNALED SHOCK SCHEDULES: RULING OUT ASYMMETRY AND RESPONSE FIXATION AS FACTORS
1984 · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior; v. 41; n. 1; p. 45-52; Fonte: Wiley
Dados principais
- Ano de publicação
- 1984
- Dados editoriais
- Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior; v. 41; n. 1; p. 45-52; Fonte: Wiley
- Palavras-chave
- JEAB; análise do comportamento
Autores
- Bruce B. Abbott
- Pietro Badia
Resumo
Experiment 1 tested whether a “symmetrical” choice procedure yields results different from those previously reported using the “unidirectional” standard changeover procedure (e.g., Badia & Culbertson, 1972). Subjects could change at any time from unsignaled to signaled shock by pressing a lever and from signaled to unsignaled shock by pressing a second lever. Results were identical to those of the standard procedure and showed that the standard procedure is fully adequate. Experiment 2 tested whether choice of high density signaled shock over low‐density unsignaled shock (Badia, Coker, & Harsh, 1973) resulted from initial training with equal‐density schedules. Subjects were trained and tested with signaled shock twice as dense as unsignaled shock. Three of four subjects strongly preferred the signaled condition, thus ruling out carry‐over and “response fixation” as alternative explanations.