Rate matching, probability matching, and optimization in concurrent ratio schedules

Dados principais

Ano de publicação: 2022
Dados editoriais: Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior; v. 118; n. 1; p. 96-131; Fonte: Wiley
Palavras-chave: JEAB; análise do comportamento
DOI: 10.1002/jeab.771

Abrir fonte original

Autores

William M. Baum ORCID: 0000-0001-7070-5223
Carlos F. Aparicio
Benigno Alonso‐Alvarez ORCID: 0000-0003-3432-6239

Resumo

Much research has documented rate matching in concurrent variable‐interval schedules, but comparatively little research has examined performance in concurrent variable‐ratio schedules, except in discrete‐trials procedures that sometimes produce probability matching. One should expect that the two types of schedule would result in different performances, because ratio schedules cannot improve with time the way interval schedules do; ratio schedules lack the temporal dynamics of interval schedules. The present experiment exposed rats to concurrent variable‐ratio schedules. Seven unsignaled components were presented in random order within each daily session, with probability ratios ranging from 1:8 to 8:1. Three conditions were studied that varied the overall probability of food while leaving probability ratios the same. Choice appeared to conform to probability matching, because sensitivities in the rate–matching relation were close to 0.5, whereas sensitivities to probability ratio were close to 1.0. The sensitivities alone, however, could not confirm probability matching, because undermatching to rate occurs often. Analyses at smaller time scales supported the interpretation of probability matching. In particular, control by food deliveries was highly local in concurrent variable‐ratio schedules, in contrast with concurrent variable‐interval schedules, in which control is extended. Activity continued to switch between alternatives throughout components, contradicting optimal sampling theory.

Link de acesso

https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.771