Indexador

AbstractDifferential reinforcement of alternative behavior (DRA) without extinction is an effective intervention for reducing problem behavior maintained by socially mediated reinforcement, particularly when implementing dense schedules of reinforcement for appropriate behavior. Thinning schedules of reinforcement for an alternative response may result in resurgence of problem behavior. Resurgence may be of particular concern in the treatment of problem behavior without extinction because problem behavior that resurges is also likely to encounter reinforcement and thus can be expected to maintain. In the present investigation, we compared the effectiveness of single and concurrent DRA schedules in decreasing the probability of resurgence when problem behavior continues to produce reinforcement throughout all phases of the evaluation. Concurrent DRA schedules reduced or eliminated the likelihood of resurgence compared with a single DRA schedule during a treatment challenge.

Resumo não informado pela fonte indexada.

As relações regionais no Brasil se dão de forma desequilibrada, refletem-se nas interações sociais e nas construções identitárias e, desse modo, precisam ser consideradas dentro dos processos psicoterapêuticos. Ainda que alguns temas socioculturais tenham sido inseridos na discussão dessas práticas clínicas, o local de origem dos clientes tem sido pouco considerado. Portanto, compreendendo o tamanho continental do Brasil, as enormes diferenças culturais entre suas diferentes regiões e as relações historicamente estabelecidas de poder entre elas, este estudo teórico pretende por meio de uma revisão narrativa da literaturadiscutir sobre a necessidade da regionalização da prática clínica comportamental do país. Nesse sentido, regionalizar significa dar ênfase aos aspectos culturais regionais compreendendo as identidades minoritárias resultantes das interações entre as regiões. Se tomará como referência as relações desiguais entre o Nordeste e as demais regiões do país, como forma de elucidar essa proposta. Assim, para tanto, propõe-se que as relações entre a perspectiva psicológica clínico-social da Green FAP, o conceito de interseccionalidade, e o modelo avaliativo ADDRESSING, em conjunto, possam auxiliar nesse processo de regionalização das questões psicológicas no processo clínico.

AbstractThere is scarce research on adapting evidence‐based practices, such as Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA)‐based therapy, for Deaf/Hard of Hearing (DHH) children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The current case involved delivering intensive ABA‐based intervention for improving communication skills to a 5‐year‐old child, Lilly, with dual diagnoses of DHH and ASD. Teaching procedures were modified to include consideration of deaf cultural norms, incorporation of American Sign Language (ASL)‐specific instructional procedures, and consultation with an ASL interpreter within all intervention sessions. Outcome data measured by the Verbal Behavior Milestones Assessment and Placement Program (VB‐MAPP) reflected rapid skill acquisition across multiple verbal operants within a 7‐month admission. Recommendations on how to deliver intensive ABA‐based intervention services to children with dual diagnoses of DHH and ASD are provided for further research and discussion. Utilizing modified behavior analytic procedures can provide increased access to needed services for this population.

Resumo não informado pela fonte indexada.

The transfer and adoption of the school-wide positive behavior support (SWPBS) framework in different contexts worldwide is receiving increased interest. Identified challenges in implementing relevant systems and practices with fidelity at local schools can lead to adaptations improving the contextual fit of SWPBS, which eventually contributes to enhanced outcomes. The present study documents a 2-year systematic implementation of SWPBS in 31 elementary schools in Cyprus. Cultural and situational barriers were identified using a mixed-methods design. Data were obtained from three fidelity assessments across time, through which we examined the schools’ efforts to integrate SWPBS elements into their setting. School size and location were also used to predict implementation fidelity. External coaches’ experiences working with schools for 2 years were summarized to provide insight into the main impediments to effective implementation. Recommendations for forthcoming applications of SWPBS in contexts with similar characteristics are drawn.

Abstract The Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts (BACB Code; Behavior Analyst Certification Board®, 2020) includes six items in “Section 6—Responsibility in Research'' that cover the protection of human participants in research activities conducted by Board Certified Assistant Behavior Analysts® and Board Certified Behavior Analysts®. This article provides a brief primer regarding significant historical events and foundational documents that have resulted in the contemporary research ethics policies and practices in the field of behavior analysis. This walk through the last century from the Nuremberg Code to the Declaration of Helsinki, the Belmont Report, and 45 CFR Part 46—Protection of Human Subjects provides a summary of why the codification of requirements such as “informed consent” and “Institutional Review Board” oversight was necessary. The linkages between these historical events and the current BACB Code items are discussed. In addition, situations in which the BACB Code does not provide explicit instruction but foundational documents may provide additional guidance are considered. Finally, opportunities for future data-driven decision making in research ethics are offered.

Resumo não informado pela fonte indexada.

AbstractIntractable self-injury, aggressive, and other destructive behaviors are real human conditions. Contingent electric skin shock (CESS) is a technology, based on behavior-analytic principles, used to ameliorate such behaviors. However, CESS has always been extraordinarily controversial. The Association for Behavior Analysis (ABAI), commissioned an independent Task Force to examine the issue. After a comprehensive review, the Task Force suggested the treatment should be available for use in select cases through a largely accurate report. Yet, ABAI adopted a position indicating CESS is never appropriate. On the issue of CESS, we are extremely concerned behavior analysis departed from the fundamental epistemology of positivism and is misleading nascent behavior analysts and consumers of behavioral technology. Destructive behaviors are extremely difficult to treat. In our commentary, we outline clarifications regarding aspects of the Task Force Report, proliferation of falsehoods by leaders in our field, and limitations to the standard of care in behavior analysis. We recommend using science to answer important questions instead of propagating false information at the expense of current and future clients with treatment refractory behaviors.

Resumo não informado pela fonte indexada.