Indexador
Periódicos indexados 28 fonte(s) com registros ativos
O indexador exibe metadados públicos e mantém o acesso ao conteúdo na fonte oficial. O site não hospeda PDFs dos artigos nem substitui os periódicos originais.
Acta Comportamentalia
Abrir fonte oficialBehavior Analysis in Practice
Abrir fonte oficialBehavior Analysis: Research and Practice
Abrir fonte oficialBehavior and Social Issues
Abrir fonte oficialBehavioral Development Bulletin
Abrir fonte oficialBehavioral Interventions
Abrir fonte oficialEducation and Treatment of Children
Abrir fonte oficialEuropean Journal of Behavior Analysis
Abrir fonte oficialInternational Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy
Abrir fonte oficialJapanese Journal of Behavior Analysis
Abrir fonte oficialJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis
Abrir fonte oficialJournal of Applied Radical Behavior Analysis
Abrir fonte oficialJournal of Behavior Analysis and Support
Abrir fonte oficialJournal of Behavioral Education
Abrir fonte oficialJournal of Contextual Behavioral Science
Abrir fonte oficialJournal of Organizational Behavior Management
Abrir fonte oficialJournal of Positive Behavior Interventions
Abrir fonte oficialJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
Abrir fonte oficialNorsk Tidsskrift for Atferdsanalyse / Norwegian Journal of Behavior Analysis
Abrir fonte oficialPerspectivas em Análise do Comportamento
Abrir fonte oficialPerspectives on Behavior Science
Abrir fonte oficialRevista Brasileira de Análise do Comportamento
Abrir fonte oficialRevista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta / Mexican Journal of Behavior Analysis
Abrir fonte oficialThe Analysis of Verbal Behavior
Abrir fonte oficialThe Behavior Analyst
Abrir fonte oficialThe Behavior Analyst Today
Abrir fonte oficialThe Journal of Speech and Language Pathology – Applied Behavior Analysis
Abrir fonte oficialThe Psychological Record
Abrir fonte oficialA busca usa o termo exato informado para localizar conteúdos relacionados.
28372 registros encontrados.
Resumo não informado pela fonte indexada.
Resumo não informado pela fonte indexada.
Resumo não informado pela fonte indexada.
Resumo não informado pela fonte indexada.
Visual analysis and nonoverlap‐based effect sizes are predominantly used in analyzing single case experimental designs (SCEDs). Although they are popular analytical methods for SCEDs, they have certain limitations. In this study, a new effect size calculation model for SCEDs, named performance criteria‐based effect size (PCES), is proposed considering the limitations of 4 nonoverlap‐based effect size measures, widely accepted in the literature and that blend well with visual analysis. In the field test of PCES, actual data from published studies were utilized, and the relations between PCES, visual analysis, and the 4 nonoverlap‐based methods were examined. In determining the data to be used in the field test, 1,052 tiers (AB phases) were identified from 6 journals. The results revealed a weak or moderate relation between PCES and nonoverlap‐based methods due to its focus on performance criteria. Although PCES has some weaknesses, it promises to eliminate the causes that may create issues in nonoverlap‐based methods, using quantitative data to determine socially important changes in behavior and to complement visual analysis.
Eye‐tracking has been used to investigate observing responses in matching‐to‐sample procedures. However, in visual search, peripheral vision plays an important role. Therefore, three experiments were conducted to investigate the extent to which adult participants can discriminate stimuli that vary in size and position in the periphery. Experiment 1 used arbitrary matching with abstract stimuli, Experiment 2 used identity matching with abstract stimuli, and Experiment 3 used identity matching with simple (familiar) shapes. In all three experiments, participants were taught eight conditional discriminations establishing four 3‐member classes of stimuli. Four different stimulus sizes and three different stimulus positions were manipulated in the 12 peripheral test phases. In these test trials, participants had to fixate their gaze on the sample stimulus in the middle of the screen while selecting a comparison stimulus. Eye movements were measured with a head‐mounted eye‐tracker during both training and testing. Experiment 1 shows that participants can discriminate small abstract stimuli that are arbitrarily related in the periphery. Experiment 2 shows that matching identical stimuli does not affect discrimination in the periphery compared to arbitrarily related stimuli. However, Experiment 3 shows that discrimination increases when stimuli are well‐known simple shapes.
Resumo não informado pela fonte indexada.
Resumo não informado pela fonte indexada.
Resumo não informado pela fonte indexada.
Resumo não informado pela fonte indexada.